Saturday, May 26, 2012

The Causes of the Industrial Revolution


Industry on a small scale was already in existence when The Industrialization Revolution began in earnest in the 18th century in Great Britain and is still developing today.  The beauty of this is; it moved people from the countryside quickly into the ever expanding cities; subsequently turning labor into a disciplined primary indoor activity, with an increasing distinction between owners, employers, white collar managers, and blue collar workers.  Britain, in all her glory set about undeniable change so much so that the rest of the world wanted to emulate her success in mass producing cheap manufactured goods; furthermore taking advantage of her country’s assets; water, iron, cotton, and coal.  Aristocracy meant one came from money; however, Britain created the ever powerful middleclass who could start with nothing and become excessively wealthy via ingenious creations used or by backing new inventions and mechanical improvements.
Prior to industrialization, the majority of Britain’s population primarily resided in her vast countryside living off of the land by growing grain and raising sheep employing manual labor in the warmer months and rationing their supplies in the harsh winters.  Everything was accomplished without machines and fully dependent upon nature.  A Cottage Industry was created and used the idle farmers’ families in the winter months to work the raw materials given them from a city merchant by first washing, then carding, spinning, and finally weaving the wool.  The transformation of the wool turned into cloth was then given back to the merchant to sell and the process started again, enabling the merchants a sizable profit from selling in the city or sold as export.  This endeavor alone helped prepare Britain for the Industrial Revolution by improving the economy through the increase of trade as she became well known overseas for her high quality and low cost exports.  Prior to the revolution, most of the farms were well established from generation to generation on common land leased from a wealthy land baron owning vast lands.  As each generation took a section of the land it became strips just enough to eke a living. Unfortunately, the average farmer was being driven out with the revolution in force as it was essential the land must be in larger parcels to maximize efficiency with the new development of agricultural methods. Thus, enclosures were created and the peasants without political clout often didn’t have access to water or wood.  Without work, farmers and their families left by the hordes to the city.
Britain was the perfect country to be the first to experience industrialization.  Firstly, she had large deposits of coal to fuel new ideas because she was accustomed to using wood for warmth.  Secondly, anything she didn’t have could be provided by her many colonies and in turn, these colonies were a captive market for the myriad of goods brought on by the industrial revolution.  Britain had copious amounts of cotton.  This simple, cheap, easily made product that everyone could use; tripled in production and was easily transported.  Thirdly, Britain had three unique social elements; education, modern work attitude, and a modern government.  The educated could easily operate the machinery and read the manuals; people weren’t hesitant to leave the country to work in the cities, had a large middle class, flexible mercantile class, and the English were not opposed to new money unlike their contemporaries.  This very broad thinking allowed them to accept the new wealthy and their exciting new ideas.  Fourthly, Britain’s constitutional monarchy was flexible enough to support the new system, and they and the Bank of England provided incredible backing to new ideas, which in turn brought new wealth.  Lastly, many of these accomplishments were due to Britain’s insularity suffering rare interruption of war.  Between 1838 and 1850, Britain’s rail lines increased from 540 to 6,621 track kilometers; rail lines were thought the best way to monitor a country’s industrialization.
Most assuredly, technology is the greatest aspect of the Industrial Revolution.  The very first product to undergo change from manual to mechanize was cotton.  At one time wool in Britain was thirty times that of cotton; however, as fashion amongst the upper class preferred the light weight of cotton, demand became so great that production couldn’t keep up.  This demand spurred four inventions that would revolutionize the industry; John Kay’s ‘Flying Shuttle’, James Hargreaves ‘Spinning Jenny’, Richard Arkwright’s ‘Water Frame’, and Samuel Cromptom’s ‘Cromptom’s Mule.  Within a 35 year period, more than 100,000 power looms with 9,330,000 spindles were put into service in England and Scotland.  The importation of raw cotton had increased to eight times its past rate and half of Britain’s exports were now refined cotton.  The Textile industry was the first to employ the factory system.  The raw materials used were essentially wool and cotton with machines used to take the raw product and create fabric.  Using an assembly line approach, they created huge volumes of fabric in less time for less money at the expense of their workers who put in tremendous hours whether they were man, woman, or child.  Two other notables are; Samuel Slater, brought textile machinery design to the U.S.; and Eli Whitney invented the cotton gin; separating cotton seed from the cotton fiber. 
James Watt improved upon and patented the ‘steam engine’ by making a reciprocating engine; it truly became a profitable steam engine.  Robert Fulton created the first ‘steam boat’ that could take off on its own power and held strong in storms.  Stevenson created the ‘steam powered train’ which allowed increased communication and trade between places considered too far before.  The steam powered train became a huge success throughout the world.  Britain wholeheartedly encouraged the building of railways in European countries using British capital, equipment and technicians.  Railroads most definitely were a standard item of British export.
The Industrial Revolution brought about a drastic change in the social structure of society.  Before the revolution, they lived in villages and worked as a family unit doing everything by hand either in agriculture or as a skilled craftsman.  The new enclosure laws demanded all grazing grounds be fenced at the owner’s expense – forcing many poor farmers into bankruptcy and unemployment.  In addition, the new machinery capable of huge output made small hand weavers redundant.  Out of options, families moved to the cities and worked in the factories for longer hours and less money on top of increased living expenses.  Since they desperately needed money, women and children were also forced to work.  Factory owners were thrilled with the cheap labor of women and children.  Children were also exploited in the mines as they were small enough to get more coal and ore from the deep and unsafe pits; often working up to eighteen hours per day.  Sadly, children started as young as eight years old.  During this period of growth and profit, capitalism flourished. Factories operated with very little government regulations; allowing the wealth middle class owners to follow the path of the most profit irrespective of the well being of their workers as they were expendable.  This lust for profit brought about another social change; the breakdown of the family unit.  Due to the eighteen hour workdays, families had little contact with each other, often shared their abodes with another family, and only had time to sleep when together.  The end result was sick children without education, stunted growth, and maladjusted without parental guidance.  Infant mortality was fifty percent.  The appalling living conditions had little sanitation and comfort for the poor working class.  On the positive side, by 1820, most classes were benefitting in some way and making better wages from the huge profits; overall health and material conditions for the people improved; and the government eventually took a stand against child labor.
After the publication of the 1932 Sadler Report acknowledging evidence of human rights abuse and horrific working conditions after an in-depth investigation; the British government was forced to implement various reforms regarding the social and working conditions in Britain.
The vast majority of the British population remained disenfranchised from the electoral system.  Before 1832, the 6% of the male population that could vote were rich aristocrats owning vast acres of land.  However, after 1832, the middle class factory owners wanted political power to match their new found economic gain; bringing about the Reform Bill of 1832 enabling 20% of the male population to vote. The middle class were more or less fairly happy, but blue collar workers were still not represented by the British electoral system.  Even though Britain was wholly dependent on its working class especially with the factories and the mines; it did not want to give up any of its control over society in the political world especially after what had happened during France’s revolution.  The British hoped to avoid their catastrophe at any cost.  It would be another thirty years with the Second Reform Act that the working class had the right to vote.  Prior to that, trade unions developed for all workers skilled or not.  The working man’s political party led to what is now known as Britain’s Labour Party.
In conclusion, Great Britain amassed a fortune and set precedence for the rest of the world by clearly demonstrating the country’s openness to creative new ideas culminating in an odyssey of technical advancements irrespective from whence they came.  Britain supported its inventors and their inventions enthusiastically knowing it would gain ten fold by financing the projects from agriculture, textile, ships, railroads, factories, and countless others.  Unlike Europe, Britain realized the strength a middle class could bring and welcomed them to share in the wealth.  On the downside, Britain had a duty towards the privileges and power of the rich; but the huddled poor were treated shabbily without an iota of respect towards their plight of long working days in factories, ungodly child labor abuse, and the appalling conditions the workers were subjected to merely to survive.  Fortunately, the blue collar workers organized themselves and realized as a team they had the power to affect the factories if they didn’t get better treatment – and they eventually did.  In any case, Britain’s industrial revolution was a godsend for the rest of the world economically and placed it at the forefront in technology for mass production.

Tuesday, May 1, 2012

Russian Empire Question 1


a) What did your country/region gain or lose (including land and political power) from the Congress of Vienna?


The Congress of Vienna gave the Russian Empire extreme political clout on one hand.  On the other, Russia was vying for a deal in which much of the Prussian and Austrian shares of the partitions of Poland would go to them under the Polish Saxon agreement they had devised with Prussia.  Russia was hoping to create a Polish kingdom under Tsar Alexander.  Tallyrand of France outfoxed them by aligning with Austria, and Britain; signing a secret treaty declaring war if need be.  Russia didn’t want to take chance.  It was finally agreed, Russia could have most of the Napoleonic Duchy of Warsaw.
b) Were your country/region’s leaders and people satisfied with the outcome of the Congress of Vienna?

With regards to the Congress of Vienna, the leaders and people of the Russian Empire were extremely influential in the old world comeback of Europe and relished their involvement in helping restore a sense of peace and pride.  Internally, was another matter; even though Russia was a superpower, her government was often inefficient, little economic progress, and her people were isolated, kept her from thriving like Europe.

Monday, February 13, 2012

Why was Louis the XIV an Absolute Monarch?


If one can possibly imagine, this precious young child full of innocence and promise became king at the tender age of four in 1643 upon the death of his beloved father Louis III.  As he was far too young to make any decisions about anything other than his favorite toy or what food he preferred, the spoiled little boy had to rely upon Cardinal Mazarin to rule France in his name until his death in 1661.  By this stage, twenty – three year old Louis the XIV had been rigorously trained to be a worthy, powerful monarch to his beloved country, France.

He was extremely popular with his subjects when he assumed the role of king.  His maniacal belief his authority was inherited and came directly from God was a theory heavily supported by the Catholic Church that taught kings had only to answer to God, and since all power came from God, the king was only responsible to God, not to the people in the manner he chose to exercise that power. Thereby, he didn’t feel the necessity to account to anyone but his own conscience as he so cleverly stated, “L’Etat c’est moi.” “I am the state.”   Louis also believed, “However bad a king may be, the revolt of his subjects is criminal.”  Only God could punish a bad ruler. Louis’s mindset was greatly influenced by his court preacher, Bishop Jacques-Benigne Bossuet who wrote; “As all perfection and all strength are united in God, so all the power of individuals is united in the person of the king.  What grandeur that a single man should embody so much.”  Thereby, he fit the bill perfectly of an absolute monarch which in essence is; a ruler who governs alone and is not restrained by laws, a constitution, or custom.
Whilst in training under the direction of his mother, Louis the XIV saw the French monarchy was weakened for a very long time with the corruption of the nobles of which many were much wealthier than the king.  He realized his monarch would be shaky as long as a minister controlled the finances of the kingdom.  Upon becoming king, he surprised everyone by taking immense interest in the day to day operations – especially the finances; then purely under the control of Nicholas Fouquet who had amassed extreme wealth at the expense of the monarchy. Fouquet greatly underestimated Louis XIV as being a gad about who loved court, theatre and beautiful women, and also didn’t consider him to be very intelligent. He was certain Louis would soon bore of the tedium of finance.  He went to great lengths to entertain Louis and his paramour at his exquisite Palace at Vaux-le-Vicomte which proved to be his undoing.  What Louis lacked in intelligence, he made up for in common sense and a sense of duty to his monarch.  Very carefully, he set about a plan while presiding over the Breton Parliament to have Fouquet arrested and made an example of. Fouquet was so shocked by this public humiliation he proclaimed, “I thought I stood as high with the king as any man in France.”  It was supposedly, in celebration of his assuming full control of the monarch that the king uttered the joyous words, “L’Etat c’est moi.” “I am the state.”  If anyone dared question his authority, his reply was, “It is legal because I wish it.” “Laws are the sovereign of the sovereigns.” 
Peter the Great and Louis the XIV were very similar in their way of thinking regarding absolute power.  Both thought it was their God given right.  The difference being, Louis saw the damage nobility cause the monarchy and therefore became an absolute ruler in part towards his hatred of them and self preservation.  Peter on the other hand, wanted this power and felt he had the right. Peter affected daily life of his peoples customs, whereas, Louis was more practical, such as overhauling taxes cutting nobles out of collection, etc. Louis most visible legacy was the ‘Palace of Versailles”, Peter’s was the fortress of St. Petersburg on the Neva River, his ‘window to the west’.
Undoubtedly the longest running king in European history, Louis XIV ruled for seventy – two years until his death with unwavering faith his every decision was made for the benefit of the monarch and the people of France.   As stated earlier, he took complete personal control of his government knowing his peoples would support him completely because they were sick and tired of the constant foreign wars and civil disputes.  He was calm, proud, and intimidating, and in spite of his vast social duties in court, absolutely noting interfered with his conduct of public business. He used incredible common sense in very carefully selecting his good ministers and kept them by giving his full support.  This started by removing Fouquet from power and giving him life imprisonment for embezzling. Of course, all were guilty including Mazarin, but none as blatant as Fouquet.  The powerful Fouquet’s removal and sentencing set precedence. Colbert was his principal minister until his death in 1685.  Colbert, who was never given a title but was simply an agent of the king, accomplished several milestones during his tenure.  He was responsible for rebuilding powerful French navy, organized French possessions in Canada, West Indies, Madagascar, and India. Additionally, he reformed most sections of the administration, systemized the laws, created a better system of taxation, greatly improved roads, and river navigation and canals.  He also sharply reduced the annual treasury deficit, and commerce, industry, and overseas colonies were developed by state subsidies with tight control over quality.  Louis was a patron of the arts both literary and artistic and spent lavishly on buildings to house the arts, such as the Louvre.  He loved the idea of glorifying the monarch.  He also established a number of academies for painting and sculpting, architecture, inscriptions, the Paris Observatory, science, literary and so many others including his greatest extravagance the Palace of Versailles.
Under his tenure as king, there were three major wars and two minor; the War of Devolution 1667 -68, Franco Dutch War 72 -78, War of the Reunions 83-84, War of the League of Augsburg 88-97, and the Spanish Succession War 1701-14.  The latter was fought during Louis’s declining years.
Louis XIV had no problem challenging the nobility because of his deep distrust and hatred of them.  His very control of the Crown was at their expense.  He very cleverly used the nobles to his advantage by constructing a massive amount of apartments in his Palace of Versailles where they would reside to be in favor with him.  Marvelously charming, they didn’t mind giving up their private armies so as not to interfere with his reign.  They were stripped of their privacy in every way including him personally opening their mail to ascertain total loyalty.  Louis also insisted in receiving complete attention from all of the nobles, so in this way he could always know where they were.
Louis XIV ensured the legal system received the much needed modernization required to carry it through future leaders’ reforms. He reformed the civil law in 1667, making it mandatory to record baptisms, marriages, and deaths in the registers of the civil state instead of the Church. Criminal law in 1670 was a system where punishment was fairly broken into categories; retribution, deterrence, and incapacitation. The Maritime Code was presented in 1672. To enforce his reformed legal system, he required a vast army. At the time of his death, he had amassed 350,000 soldiers to fight for France. This modern army was completely controlled by the state and answered to the Secretary of the State of War and the Intendants who worked for him. 
These men relied on Louis for professional advancement so they added the feudal noble’s armies from the past to the state’s army; which served a two fold purpose - increased absolute power and reduced nobility power. To avoid regional governors from becoming too powerful, Louis regularly moved them from province to province.
The French Treasury was close to bankrupt when Louis took over the reins. He gained wealth back by first removing the existing Finance Minister Fouquet and replacing with his senior Minister, Colbert. Together, they reduced the national debt via efficient taxation; in four categories. The aides and douanes were customs duties; the gabelle was a tax on salt, and the taille was a tax on land of which the nobles were no longer allowed to take a part of this money. However, they were still allowed a good tax break. France’s finances were strengthened through commerce and trade as well as new manufacturers, industries, and inventors who created silk and tapestries to produce for France. He also commissioned professional manufacturers and artisans from all parts of Europe to decrease French dependence on foreign imported goods at the same time increasing French exports.This considerably decreased the flow of money leaving France. Colbert also improved the navy and its prestige to gain control of the seas in time of war and peace. His improvements extended to the highways and waterways of France to decrease the cost of transportation of goods domestically. Outside of France, Colbert and the king thoroughly encouraged the development of colonies in Asia, Africa, and the Americas to provide markets for French exports and resources for French industries. The above changes brought immense wealth back to France.
Due to Louis love and close contact with his mother during his growing years, he developed a discriminating love of the arts, both literal and visual. His favorite written work was none other than the dramatist, Jean Racine whom he later kept as his official historian. When the opportunity arose, he loved Racine’s books being read to him. Through his mother’s training, he was polite, had a commanding regal air, and accomplished at ceremonial functions and display. He was very devout in attending mass everyday as a Catholic and deeply suspicious of Protestants and Jansenets; a group of Catholic Augestinian, in general. He really believed in his heart of hearts until his death, as king he answered to no one but God. This was his right. He was arrogant, attended court regularly with socializing, dancing, fencing, and riding. However, when it came to matters of the state or studying, he was very hard working. What he lacked in intelligence, he more than made up for in common sense which bordered on genius when it came to selecting the very finest ministers or major decisions to improve France; such as breaking down the nobles to work for him rather than against. He also paid tremendous attention to the tiniest details.
In conclusion, Louis XIV ruled France from 1643 – 1715, was the premier example of the absolute European monarch.  During his reign, he increased the Crown’s influence and authority over the Church and aristocracy, thereby consolidating absolute monarchy in France.  Louis XIV was known as the sun king, everything in France and Europe revolved around him; he was the source of power.  His construction of the Palace of Versailles not only further weakened the nobility; it was a future base for kings to come. He brought immense culture to France. He ruled with dignity, self control, used an iron hand all while remaining polite and somewhat affable.  Most decisions benefitted France; and the mistake that harmed him most was the revocation of the Edict of Nantes which pushed Protestants to leave France.

Wednesday, January 11, 2012

Why Was Religion So Important To the Ottoman Empire (Re-write)

The Ottoman Empire began in earnest in 1299 in the river valley of Sakarya by a man named Osman. He created a confederation of the Turkish tribes connected by their shared Islamic faith and urgent passion to spread their religious beliefs, declaring himself the first Sultan.  He was the beginning of the driving force that was one of the most populous and longest empires in our history lasting for six centuries.  During their reign of dominance, they began with the severely weakened Sultanate of Selijuq run by Persians of Anatolia and equated with the downfall of the Byzantine Empire.  The Ottoman Empire was so powerfully organized in its attacks and methodology of control that it singlehandedly changed the power of a singular Christian European society to an Islamic direction. At the height of its power, it contained 29 provinces and controlled territory in Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa.  Charles Darwin so aptly stated,” Remember what risks the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks.”
Firstly, religion was important to all of Europe, Africa, and Eastern Asia prior, during, and after the life of the Ottoman Empire.  Religion was a quintessential part of human existence from the time they were born, taught by their parents and passed on generation to generation.  The Turks believed in Islam which they considered to not only be a religion, but also a complete way of life.  The Turkish were determined if at all possible, to convert all other religions to theirs in the lands they had conquered.  It is to their credit, they were quite tolerant of other religious beliefs within their empire for those who simply felt too strongly about their existing faiths to convert.

The Ottoman Empire began as a group of Turks known as Muslims because of their faith in Islam.  They fervently believed in one, unique incomparable God who had complete authority over human destiny and in life after death.  They believed only through Islam, you learned mercy, forgiveness, and peace. They believed in the chain of 17 prophets that included Abraham, Moses, and Jesus but especially believed God’s final eternal message to mankind came from the Prophet Mohammad through the archangel Gabriel.  They believed they were giving God their complete submission to his will, referring to him as ‘Allah’.  They followed the Devine Law known as Sharia to the letter knowing doing so would please God and protect their souls. They thoroughly believed their powers of persuasion, observation and intelligence making them a super power was purely due to the power of Islam.  Under the Muslim millet, any and all Muslims regardless of common heritage, language, or citizenship prospered beautifully under the Ottoman Empire as they were all treated equally and given the same privileges.
In the Quran, millet was always referred to as religion and a religious community; its actual meaning is nation stemming from the Arabic word millah.  It alluded to all religions; Christian, Judaism, Muslim, and I suppose, even non-believers.  Bear in mind, the millet system was already in existence when Ottoman conquered Constantinople, they merely continued the practice as they were hard driven soldiers and not in the least bit interested in the internal and private affairs of inferior people who were non-believers of Islam. However, in order to control the masses of their religiously diverse population as a corporation at an age where technology in administration and communication were nearly non-existent, they developed a hierarchical government structure where each man’s place was clearly defined. Superiors were held accountable for the performance and conduct of the people under their authority and the discharge of governmental responsibility were closely regulated. The Ottomans realized to have a successful centralized government; they had to be quite flexible and realistic.  In the 19th century, while still preserving its original meanings it also came to signify the modern concept of nation and nationality. The system under Islamic rules, allowed all minorities of other faiths to rule themselves with separate legal courts concerning individual law with little interference from the Ottoman government as long as a Muslim was not involved in the case.   By the nineteenth century, the two largest millets were Muslim and Greek Orthodox.
After 1,100 years in power, the primarily Christian Byzantine Empire was crushed with the capture of Constantinople in 1453 by Sultan Mehmet and became the Ottoman’s capital.  This had a tremendous effect on Christian Europe. In 1454, Mehmet established the first Greek Orthodox millet which was comprised of all orthodox in one single community in spite of the language difference, ethnic backgrounds and the fact that the religious chain of command was definitely Greek dominated.  This included; Greek Orthodox, Albanians, Macedonians, Vlachs, Georgians, Serbs, Romanians, Arab Christians and Bulgarians.  Mehmed II appointed Gennadios II Scholarios as the Ecumenical Patriarch, known as the Greek Patriarch of Constantinople.  His authority was greatly increased under Ottoman.  Firstly, he was now responsible for the religious and spiritual affairs of millions of Orthodox Slavs that had previously been under independent Bulgarian and Serbian churches. Secondly, the Patriarch’s authority now expanded to include administrative, financial, and legal responsibilities of a civil nature. By the 16th century, he was also in control of the Orthodox communities in Arabic speaking lands. Needless to say, the devout orthodox followed him to the letter as he was recognized as the highest religious and political leader of all Orthodox peoples of the Sultan of the Ottoman, and considered the successor of Saint Andrew the Apostle. It is their belief God revealed himself in Jesus, the incarnation of Christ, his crucifixion and resurrection.  Orthodox means right belief or right thinking.  Their approach to theology, tradition and worship was drawn in part from the Greeks, Middle Eastern, Russia, and Slav regions.  They ardently believe the Holy Spirit is in and as the guide to the Church working through the whole body of the Church, as well as through priests and bishops.  The Orthodox follows the Old Testament of the Bible using the ancient Jewish translation into Greek called the Septuagint and sings their prayers to the Eucharist.  All of the above orthodox fervently followed their beliefs for the safe passage of their souls into heaven with Jesus.
 It was a common practice to take Christian boys and convert them to Muslim to serve under the Sultan, and hundreds of others after converting, were trained and educated to serve the military. Because Islam was the dominant religion, certain practices had to be followed; only Muslims could rule, Muslims absolutely could not convert to other religions, non-Muslims could not attempt to convert Muslims without suffering serious consequences, and non- Muslims attire was different than Muslims.  Another difference was the fact adult Christians and Jews living in an Islamic state were required to pay a special tax called the jizya that Muslims did not have to pay.  This tax was paid in agreement between the Christians and the Muslims for tolerance of their religious practices and protection of their Islamic state.  The common denominator between Muslims and the Orthodox Christians was both prayed in song several times per day starting at dawn and finishing at sunset.  The one major legacy of the Ottoman Empire in modern day Turkey as we know it is the non-conformists who follow secularism don’t believe a person with a religious faith should be given special consideration from the state.  From the beginning of time until the end, religion is the property of the people and of God.
In conclusion, one of the great successes of the Ottoman Empire was the unity of the social structure of its highly diverse populations through its millet system where the people kept their own religious laws, traditions, and language under the general protection of the sultan. Plurality was the key to the endurance of the Empire. Ultimately, the Empire’s somewhat high degree of tolerance for ethnic differences demonstrated to be one of its greatest strengths in merging the new regions but this non-absorbent procedure became a weakness after the rise of nationalism. The Ottoman Empire survived 38 Sunni Sultans and was controlled by religion.  Without question, they would have preferred all of their conquered subjects to believe exactly as they did and dreamt of a world under Islam.
Christopher Hitchens, a well known controversial writer of religion and politics who passed away last month quoted; “Faith is the surrender of the mind; it’s the surrender of reason, it’s the only thing that makes us different from other mammals.  It’s our need to believe, and to surrender our skepticism and our reason.”







Globale.org. “Turkish Toleration.” Accessed December 10, 2011. http://www.globaled.org/nyworld/materials/ottoman/Turkish.html

Bbc.co,uk. “Ottoman Empire (1301-1922).” Accessed December 10, 2011.

Onlinelibrary.wiley.com. “THE MILLET SYSTEM IN THE NINETEENTH-CENTURY OTTOMAN EMPIRE.” April 03, 2007. Accessed December 10, 2011. http://www.onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1967.tb01260.x/abstract

Transanatolie.com. “The Ottoman Empire 1700-1922.” Accessed December 10, 2011. http://www.transanatolie.com/english/turkey/Turkey
Goodreads.com. Elians, Habesci. “The Present State Of The Ottoman Empire.” Kessinger Publishing, LLC 2009. Accessed December 10, 2011. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7564333-the-present-state-of-the-ottoman-empire

Saturday, December 10, 2011

Why Was Religion So Important To the Ottoman Empire


The Ottoman Empire began in earnest in 1299 in the river valley of Sakarya by a man named Osman. He created a confederation of the Turkish tribes connected by their shared Islamic faith and urgent passion to spread their religious beliefs, declaring himself the first Sultan.  He was the beginning of the driving force that was one of the most populous and longest empires in our history lasting for six centuries.  During their reign of dominance, they began with the severely weakened Sultanate of Selijuq run by Persians of Anatolia and equated with the downfall of the Byzantine Empire.  The Ottoman Empire was so powerfully organized in its attacks and methodology of control that it singlehandedly changed the power of a singular Christian European society to an Islamic direction. At the height of its power, it contained 29 provinces and controlled territory in Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa.  Charles Darwin so aptly stated,” Remember what risks the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks.”
Firstly, religion was important to all of Europe, Africa, and Eastern Asia prior, during, and after the life of the Ottoman Empire.  Religion was a quintessential part of human existence from the time they were born, taught by their parents and passed on generation to generation.  The Turks believed in Islam which they considered to not only be a religion, but also a complete way of life.  The Turkish were determined if at all possible, to convert all other religions to theirs in the lands they had conquered.  It is to their credit, they were quite tolerant of other religious beliefs within their empire for those who simply felt too strongly about their existing faiths to convert.
The Ottoman Empire began as a group of Turks known as Muslims because of their faith in Islam.  They fervently believed in one, unique incomparable God who had complete authority over human destiny and in life after death.  They believed only through Islam, you learned mercy, forgiveness, and peace. They believed in the chain of 17 prophets that included Abraham, Moses, and Jesus but especially believed God’s final eternal message to mankind came from the Prophet Mohammad through the archangel Gabriel.  They believed they were giving God their complete submission to his will, referring to him as ‘Allah’.  They followed the Devine Law known as Sharia to the letter knowing doing so would please God and protect their souls. They thoroughly believed their powers of persuasion, observation and intelligence making them a super power was purely due to the power of Islam.  Under the Muslim millet, any and all Muslims regardless of common heritage, language, or citizenship prospered beautifully under the Ottoman Empire as they were all treated equally and given the same privileges. 
In the Quran, millet was always referred to as religion and community; its actual meaning is nation stemming from the Arabic word millah.  It alluded to all religions; Christian, Judaism, Muslim, and I suppose, even non-believers.  Bear in mind, the millet system was already in existence when Ottoman conquered Constantinople, they merely continued the practice as they were hard driven soldiers and not in the least bit interested in the internal and private affairs of inferior people who were non-believers of Islam. The system under Islamic rules, allowed all minorities of other faiths to rule themselves with separate legal courts concerning individual law with little interference from the Ottoman government as long as a Muslim was not involved in the case.   By the nineteenth century, the two largest millets were Muslim and Greek Orthodox.
After 1,100 years in power, the primarily Christian Byzantine Empire was crushed with the capture of Constantinople in 1453 by Sultan Mehmet and became the Ottoman’s capital.  This had a tremendous effect on Christian Europe. In 1454, Mehmet established the first Greek Orthodox millet which was comprised of all orthodox in one single community in spite of the language difference, ethnic backgrounds and the fact that the religious chain of command was definitely Greek dominated.  This included; Greek Orthodox, Albanians, Macedonians, Vlachs, Georgians, Serbs, Romanians, Arab Christians and Bulgarians.  Mehmed II appointed Gennadios II Scholarios as the Ecumenical Patriarch, known as the Greek Patriarch of Constantinople. The devout orthodox followed him to the letter as he was recognized as the highest religious and political leader of all Orthodox peoples of the Sultan of the Ottoman.  The Patriarch was considered the successor of Saint Andrew the Apostle.    It is their belief God revealed himself in Jesus, the incarnation of Christ, his crucifixion and resurrection.  Orthodox means right belief or right thinking.  Their approach to theology, tradition and worship was drawn in part from the Greeks, Middle Eastern, Russia, and Slav regions.  They ardently believe the Holy Spirit is in and as the guide to the Church working through the whole body of the Church, as well as through priests and bishops.  The Orthodox follow the Old Testament of the Bible using the ancient Jewish translation into Greek called the Septuagint and sing their prayers to the Eucharist.  All of the above orthodox fervently followed their beliefs for the safe passage of their souls into heaven with Jesus.
Without question, the Ottoman Empire survived 38 Sunni Sultans and was controlled by religion.  The Turks would have preferred all of their conquered subjects to believe exactly as they did and dreamt of a world under Islam.  They often took Christian boys and converted them to Muslim to serve under the Sultan, and hundreds of others after converting, were trained and educated to serve the military. Because Islam was the dominant religion, certain practices had to be followed; only Muslims could rule, Muslims absolutely could not convert to other religions, non-Muslims could not attempt to convert Muslims without suffering serious consequences, and non- Muslims attire was different than Muslims.  Another difference was the fact adult Christians and Jews living in an Islamic state were required to pay a special tax called the jizya that Muslims did not have to pay.  This tax was paid in agreement between the Christians and the Muslims for tolerance of their religious practices and protection of their Islamic state.  The common denominator between Muslims and the Orthodox Christians was both prayed in song several times per day starting at dawn and finishing at sunset.  The one major legacy of the Ottoman Empire in modern day Turkey as we know it is the non-conformists who follow secularism don’t believe a person with a religious faith should be given special consideration from the state.  From the beginning of time until the end, religion is the property of the people and of God.
"Turkish Toleration." http://www.globaled.org/nyworld/materials/ottoman/turkish.html (accessed December 10, 2011).
"Ottoman Empire (1301-1922)." April 09, 2009. http://www.bbc.co.uk/religion/religions/islam/history/ottomanempire_1.shtml (accessed December 10, 2011).
"THE MILLET SYSTEM IN THE NINETEENTH-CENTURY OTTOMAN EMPIRE." April 03, 2007. http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1478-1913.1967.tb01260.x/abstract (accessed December 10, 2011).
"The Ottoman Empire 1700-1922." http://www.transanatolie.com/english/turkey/Turkey PDF/ottoman empire-1700-1922-(accessed December 10, 2011).
Elias , Habesci. The Present State Of The Ottoman Empire. Kessinger Publishing, LLC, 2009. http://www.goodreads.com/book/show/7564333-the-present-state-of-the-ottoman-empire (accessed December 10, 2011).


Monday, November 28, 2011

Introduction of the Ottoman Empire

The Ottoman Empire began in earnest in 1299 in the river valley of Sakarya, upon the death of Ertugrul.  Osman, his beloved politically inclined son established the Ottoman Empire by creating a confederation of the Turkish tribes connected by their shared Islamic faith and urgent passion to spread their religious beliefs. He declared himself the first Sultan.  He was the beginning of the driving force that lasted for six centuries.  During their reign of dominance, they began with the severely weakened Sultanate of Selijuq run by Persians of Anatolia and equated with the downfall of the Byzantine Empire.  The Ottoman Empire was so powerfully organized in its attacks and methodology of control that it singlehandedly changed the power of a singular Christian European society to an Islamic direction.  Charles Darwin so aptly stated,” Remember what risks the nations of Europe ran, not so many centuries ago of being overwhelmed by the Turks.”
The Ottoman Empire was one of the most populous and longest empires known in our history.  It was purely encouraged by Islam and Islamic institutions. At the height of its power, it contained 29 provinces and controlled territory in Southeast Europe, Western Asia, and North Africa.
The Ottoman Empire’s jurisdiction permitted the unification of culturally and religiously different groups.  Their system was broken into three court categories; Muslims, non Muslims with appointed Christians and Jewish, and the trade court.  They also accepted the religious law over their peoples, entailing Judaism, Sharia, and Canon which was the Christian law.  All of this was regulated by the administrative Kanun law system by the Turks.  Of course, the Ottoman laws favored Muslims.  Christians and Jews were not treated the same and considered beneath them.  They had the right to worship but also had to pay higher taxes than Muslims.  One of the greatest horrific atrocities was the mass murder in the hundreds of thousands of Christian Armenians during the decline of the Ottoman Empire.  Elliot Engel quotes, “On the eve of World War I, an estimated two million Armenians lived in the Ottoman Empire. Well over one million were deported and hundreds of thousands simply killed.”

Monday, November 14, 2011

Lutheranism 2

Why Did Lutheranism Appeal to the Princes?

Martin Luther was a Saxon monk who had very set ideas against the Papacy.  Quite simply, he rejected the authority of the pope and insisted the Bible was the sole truth to follow.  He was a charismatic, powerful speaker who was passionate in his beliefs, and authored his publications of his sermons primarily to the universities and then the masses.  His viewpoint realistically demonstrated the controlling and corrupt power of the Catholic Church such as selling indulgences for profit and no serious repentance as one example.  His appeal was so strong, it didn’t take much for the people to agree there was mass corruption in the Church and they were fed up with the excessive fees thrust upon them.  To reach as many people as he could with his message, he wrote his pamphlets and sermons in the local German dialect so that even the simplest could understand.  He also put great emphasis on the fact the Church’s motivation towards the Germans was to exploit and use them rather than save them.  Of course, the German princes realized at once by following Lutheranism they could have absolute power over their own people and territories.
Long before Martin Luther came around, the princes had been trying to establish independence from the Church and have more power in their favor.  They had already lost quite a bit of respect for the authority of the Papacy due to a series of weak popes and didn’t want to continue paying taxes to them. When Lutheranism came about, it was hugely appealing to the Germans because he preached the Spanish and French controlled the Catholic Church and its corruption, leaving the Germans out of any decision making and forced to pay taxes to them.  However, by following his theory on religion, they had a powerful voice. When the princes converted to Lutheranism, they now had more authority over their own territories giving them more liberties and power over their civilians.
The converted Lutheran princes no longer had to send revenue as a tribute to Rome, therefore they didn’t have to collect Church fees from their citizens. This increased the wealth of their kingdoms as they could conserve the money for better usage instead of sending it for taxes to Rome. Furthermore, Lutheranism allowed the princes to confiscate monasteries which automatically increased their power, wealth, and land.  This was due to the huge amounts of money saved that were being spent on these communities.
From a religious point of view, the princes devoutly believed Martin Luther’s educated theory that a great number of the Catholic Church’s beliefs were incorrect.  One example, Luther believed God’s grace would be won by faith; while the Church felt it could only be won by good work.  In the 59 Theses, he also wrote, “Jesus is the only true head of the Church, not the pope.” The other significant point was that ‘indulgences are sinful and do not buy the way into heaven but simply provide revenue for the Church.’  These points had such a profound impact on people that many Catholics who had blindly believed their entire lives the teachings of the Church; converted to Lutheranism in an effort to save their souls and continue their journey to heaven.  The princes and the masses genuinely believed Lutheranism was the only way to save their souls.
The converted Lutheran princes empowered their political freedom.  They could now appoint their own ministers – thus ending the power struggles with the local bishops.  As fighting for authority ended, this gave the princes more power.
During the 1525 Peasant uprising, Luther was mortified.  He believed in the doctrine of two governments; our spiritual souls managed by the Holy Spirit under Christ, and the laws of worldly government that pertain to our life on earth.  In this case, the princes were the worldly government. Martin Luther supported the princes by quoting the Bible’s New Testament stating “God expects Christians to obey their princes obsolete.”  In their uprising against the princes, Luther accused them of three serious charges; they violated their oath of loyalty to their rulers, they robbed, destroyed, and murdered like animals, and were subject to death in this life and the hereafter, and finally they committed their crimes using Christ’s name; thereby blatantly defaming God.  He was outraged and felt the devil had taken hold of them.  From the peasants’ perspective, using violence against the aristocracy was their way of getting noticed in their efforts for a fairer share of the kingdoms profits.  They were sick and tired of the constant struggle of poverty.
In conclusion, Martin Luther had no idea how widespread his puritan philosophy would spread.  Even the Roman Catholic Church didn’t take his sermons seriously until it was too late.  By the time they decided to act upon it, his Lutheranism begun in Germany had spread to other countries as well.  The once powerful Church was steeped in corruption by its administration.  In the end, people had a choice of remaining a Catholic or relocating to an area where they practiced being a Lutheran or Protestant.  People were more independent of their knowledge of the Bible and came to their own conclusions in their translations of the Holy Book.  The money that used to go to the Church, the Lutherans could now use that money for their own territories.